I have to disagree with the theories floated here on the possibility of revocation of shares or suspension of trading.
The Wells Notice was issued almost 3 years ago. The revocation was threatened in that notice, but at the time the company's financial statements were in a serious state of disarray. I've always said I believe the threat of revocation was made to light a fire under the company to get those financial statements corrected and reissued. While it took longer than most investors thought, it is done and we are current and accurate in the filings.
The SEC has no grounds to revoke shares at this point in the proceedings. The company has shown progress not only with actual airships being tested and sold and revenues booked, but has a credible management team and appears to have real interest from other technology companies.
Civil fines certainly, but revocation of shares? Well, if I thought that, I certainly wouldn't be buying shares. And I still believe there will be a settlement before the trial date.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
