Replies to post #325167 on Spongetech Delivery Systems Inc (fka SPNGQ)

[scion]

07/09/2010 77 Letter Opposing Defendant Pensley's Request for Extenstion of Deadline to respond to PI Motion by U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (Tao, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/09/2010)

Doc 77 PDF file
http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/sa44H

[scion]

07/09/2010 78 RESPONSE in Opposition re 44 First MOTION to Appoint Receiver over Defendant Spongetech filed by Michael Metter, Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.. (Bessette, Paul) (Entered: 07/09/2010)

Doc 78 PDF file
http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/gaadXdg

[scion]

07/09/2010 79 DECLARATION of R. Adam Swick in Opposition to Plaintiff Securities And Exchange Commission's Motion to Appoint Receiver by Michael Metter, Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. A, # 2 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. B, # 3 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. C, # 4 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. D, # 5 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. E, # 6 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. F, # 7 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. G, # 8 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. H, # 9 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. I) (Bessette, Paul) (Entered: 07/09/2010)

Doc 79 PDF file
http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/padHade


Document Number: 79 2 pages 79 kb

Attachment Description
1 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. A 25 pages 0.9 mb
2 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. B 2 pages 37 kb
3 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. C 3 pages 67 kb
4 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. D 4 pages 134 kb
5 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. E 5 pages 228 kb
6 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. F 2 pages 64 kb
7 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. G 13 pages 475 kb
8 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. H 18 pages 0.8 mb
9 Exhibit Swick Decl. Ex. I 3 pages 57 kb

[scion]

Another Pacer update 09 Jul 10 SEC v Spongetech CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv-02031-DLI -JMA

Date Filed # Docket Text

07/09/2010 ORDER granting 73 Motion for Extension of Time to File -- Notwithstanding the SEC's opposition and its arguable untimeliness, defendant Joel Pensley's request for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction is GRANTED. Defendant Pensley's opposition is now due July 15, 2010 and plaintiff's reply is due on or before July 29, 2010. The court has reviewed plaintiff's opposition to the motion filed today [Docket Entry # 77]. The court admonishes defense counsel that the court takes a dim view of misrepresentations made to the court, particularly in official filings upon which the court might rely on making a decision. If the court should determine that any misrepresentations were made in the extension request, sanctions may be imposed. ALL COUNSEL ARE SO ADVISED. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/9/2010. (Irizarry, Dora) (Entered: 07/09/2010)

Defendant
Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.

Defendant
RM Enterprises International, Inc.

Defendant
Steven Moskowitz

Defendant
George Sperenza

Defendant
Joel Pensley

Defendant
Jack Halperin

Defendant
Michael Metter

https://ecf.nyed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/iquery.pl