Replies to post #325355 on Spongetech Delivery Systems Inc (fka SPNGQ)

[puppydotcom]

wild huh!

The court admonishes defense counsel that the court takes a dim view of misrepresentations made to the court, particularly in official filings upon which the court might rely on making a decision. If the court should determine that any misrepresentations were made in the extension request, sanctions may be imposed. ALL COUNSEL ARE SO ADVISED. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/9/2010. (Irizarry, Dora) (Entered: 07/09/2010)

[lucky, mydog]

sounds like Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry is ready to play hardball.

[scion]

Pacer update 12 Jul 10 SEC v Spongetech CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv-02031-DLI -JMA

Date Filed # Docket Text

07/12/2010 ORDER granting 80 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Michael Metter answer due 7/23/2010; Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. answer due 7/23/2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Joan M. Azrack on 7/12/2010. (Bhatt, Tina) (Entered: 07/12/2010)

07/12/2010 80 Letter to Judge Azrack regarding extension of time to respond to Complaint by Michael Metter, Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (Bessette, Paul) Modified on 7/12/2010 (Bhatt, Tina). (Entered: 07/12/2010)


Defendant
Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.

Defendant
RM Enterprises International, Inc.

Defendant
Steven Moskowitz

Defendant
George Sperenza

Defendant
Joel Pensley

Defendant
Jack Halperin

Defendant
Michael Metter

https://ecf.nyed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/iquery.pl