Some attorney. Letter isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Why? Because said attorney said he examined the 25 May 2010 statement posted on pink sheets. Attorney says he "deemed" it correct. That 25 May statement he certified wasn't correct. In fact, it contained a false and misleading statement, viz., A/S is given as 1.47 billion shares. However, 06 May 2010, HFBG raised the A/S to 2.67 billion according to Sec. of State Nevada.
Attorney also says he examined "such other Company records, certificates of officers, certificates of public officials, and other instruments and documents and such questions of law as I have considered necessary and appropriate as a basis for the opinions expressed herein."
The point is the paid incurious attorney, by ignoring such an easily checkable fact, evidently just rubber stamped whatever the the company gave him. That's why he says "deemed" in order to protect himself.
From the attorney letter: http://www.otcmarkets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=32498 In rendering this letter, I have examined the Unaudited Annual Report- Hall of Fame Beverages, Inc. 2009 Year End (hereinafter the "Statement") posted by the Company on the Pink Sheets News Service on May 25, 2010, and such other Company records, certificates of officers, certificates of public officials, and other instruments and documents and such questions of law as I have considered necessary and appropriate as a basis for the opinions expressed herein. All of the sources noted above are deemed to be reliable.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
