News Focus
News Focus
icon url

500_and_Long

01/02/05 9:21 PM

#60161 RE: brdsng #60157

brdsng...;)

1)do you understand that for a court to reneder summary judgement it means they have determined you HAVE NO CASE.
That is according to the evidence presented... "IF"... there is any new evidence then you are free to challenge...

2)while legal bills would certainly continue the court already told HRCT that in their opinion they have no case
And of course that goes along with my comment to your first opinion...

3)not necessarily means it is possible either way, not claiming to know but can't assume they were paid as incurred
This needs no comment....

4) they did not come in "just at the end"
They certainly came in after HRCT's response was filed and under consideration....

I'm not out for a debate but folks who make definitive comments without knowing all the "in's and outs" trouble me.
Nothing is ever final until all avenues of legal recourse have been exhausted. And in this case they have certainly not exhausted all avenues. (Not my opinion but fact)
HRCT may well except and move on (I would not) but only HRCT and Preston & Co know that for sure.
Thanks, David (smile)

icon url

Investorman

01/02/05 9:56 PM

#60162 RE: brdsng #60157

summary judgment

A final decision by a judge that resolves a lawsuit in favor of one of the parties. A motion for summary judgment is made after discovery is completed but before the case goes to trial. The party making the motion marshals all the evidence in its favor, compares it to the other side's evidence, and argues that a reasonable jury looking at the same evidence could only decide the case one way--for the moving party. If the judge agrees, then a trial would be unnecessary and the judge enters judgment for the moving party. See Topic: Lawsuits & Mediation

appeal

A written request to a higher court to modify or reverse the judgment of a trial court or intermediate level appellate court. Normally, an appellate court accepts as true all the facts that the trial judge or jury found to be true, and decides only whether the judge made mistakes in understanding and applying the law. If the appellate court decides that a mistake was made that changed the outcome, it will direct the lower court to conduct a new trial, but often the mistakes are deemed "harmless" and the judgment is left alone. Some mistakes are corrected by the appellate court -- such as a miscalculation of money damages -- without sending the case back to the trial court. An appeal begins when the loser at trial -- or in an intermediate level appellate court -- files a notice of appeal, which must be done within strict time limits (often 30 days from the date of judgment). The loser (called the appellant) and the winner (called the appellee) submit written arguments (called briefs) and often make oral arguments explaining why the lower court's decision should be upheld or overturned. See Topic: Lawsuits & Mediation