Hartcourt Companies (fka HRCT)

[500_and_Long]

brdsng...;)

1)do you understand that for a court to reneder summary judgement it means they have determined you HAVE NO CASE.
That is according to the evidence presented... "IF"... there is any new evidence then you are free to challenge...

2)while legal bills would certainly continue the court already told HRCT that in their opinion they have no case
And of course that goes along with my comment to your first opinion...

3)not necessarily means it is possible either way, not claiming to know but can't assume they were paid as incurred
This needs no comment....

4) they did not come in "just at the end"
They certainly came in after HRCT's response was filed and under consideration....

I'm not out for a debate but folks who make definitive comments without knowing all the "in's and outs" trouble me.
Nothing is ever final until all avenues of legal recourse have been exhausted. And in this case they have certainly not exhausted all avenues. (Not my opinion but fact)
HRCT may well except and move on (I would not) but only HRCT and Preston & Co know that for sure.
Thanks, David (smile)