Replies to post #57162 on Paychest Inc (PYCT)

[Iggy_Bot]

Wonder why he didn't add them to his post ? That was a desperate lawsuit wasn't it. glta

p.s. PYCT must be legit if the case was dismisssed in PYCT favor :>)

[lemon]

"The brokers filed a court action to TRY and shut down Paychest last year and kept it quiet"? "But FAILED" (last summer)

This statement is what I was referring to. How quiet could this important action be for MFridge not to know about it?

Public records should be available of that proceeding then, right?

[poopscooper]

This statement will be proven wrong again,just like it was 7 months ago...I say plenty 0001 still will be avaiable soon!!
Could be as early as tmr!!



georgegreen Share Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:43:13 AM
Re: None Post # of 66157

LOOK AT THE FACTS INDEED! NOBODY IS SELLING AT .0001 OR .0002 AND THE BROKERS HAVE TO COVER OVER 100 BILLION SHARES!
Patents have been worked on for years and are recently in hand allowing CES and PYCT to sell anywhere , anytime.
The product passed tests with flying colors.
Bid and ask returned the day the brokers found out about the patents.THEY HALTED ALL NAKED SHORTING
The brokers filed a court action to TRY to shut down pyct and kept is quiet , but FAILED .(last summer)
The brokers are calling the company BEGGING them to take millions in toxic financing so they can make this go away through a common practice they use to cover.
Share audit was done which proved the massive naked short .
Pulling of the OBO and NOBO list further proved the exact size of the naked short position.

NO WONDER THE BROKERS ARE SO SCARED , but you can only get shares by raising the bid enough (.005 to .05 ) to get any sellers!!

HA,HA