News Focus
News Focus
icon url

johnsmith123

03/27/10 9:21 AM

#300173 RE: jarta #300172

This case will be more than Hodges experience and pocketbook can handle. The fun and games not only stopped for the SEC and defendents, Al will have no life now, not that he had one anyway
icon url

Investorman

03/27/10 3:00 PM

#300187 RE: jarta #300172

Interesting. If he were to withdraw the suit, what are the chances that he will actually be sanctioned? It doesn't happen in every case but I don't know the statistics.

icon url

goldbarren58

03/27/10 3:10 PM

#300188 RE: jarta #300172

can you file "friend of the court" type letter pointing out the non evidence and history to help the judge see the frivolity of the suit?
icon url

janice shell

03/27/10 7:38 PM

#300206 RE: jarta #300172

Most of the defendants have been served and have been caused the inconvenience and embarrassment - if not the actual cost - of defending against these goofy claims.

Huh? Now I'm confused. According to the docket:

Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Frank B. Kawano, Mail Clerk, c/o Civil Process Clerk. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: # 1 signed return receipt)(Hodges, A) (Entered: 03/01/2010)


It doesn't sound to me as if anyone at all was served.