News Focus
News Focus
Followers 2583
Posts 329415
Boards Moderated 23
Alias Born 04/12/2001

Re: jarta post# 300172

Saturday, 03/27/2010 7:38:13 PM

Saturday, March 27, 2010 7:38:13 PM

Post# of 359153
Most of the defendants have been served and have been caused the inconvenience and embarrassment - if not the actual cost - of defending against these goofy claims.

Huh? Now I'm confused. According to the docket:

Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Frank B. Kawano, Mail Clerk, c/o Civil Process Clerk. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: # 1 signed return receipt)(Hodges, A) (Entered: 03/01/2010)


It doesn't sound to me as if anyone at all was served.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today