bluediamonds - Hmmmmm...If SkipperGas has figured out the plan and carefully explained it to the ENTIRE planet (with your diligent spamming help), don't you think the "shorters" know we know that they know that...well, you get he picture.
No, on second thought, you don't get the picture...ROFL!
Posted by: zeninvestor32 In reply to: None Date:10/21/2004 11:37:29 AM Post #of 19062
READ THIS
Great find by Nuffy on the CMKX thread. Read this and you will never believe another word from Stockwatch "journalists" again. Note the initial comment from the Supreme Court of British Columbia "the conduct of the defendants in the conduct of this action and in the manner on which it reported on the proceedings was sufficiently reprehensible as to merit an award of special costs." Also, this was great: "the Mudry [stockwatch "reporter"] articles were one-sided, harsh and contained extravagant epithets such as the characterization of Dr. Ager as "a peddler of worthless salted property"". LOL Oh just read it. It's a hoot. And pretty good insight into whether or not you should read one word of Lee Webb.
Also for another hoot, check out this link, wherein poor little Canjex Publishing, owner of Stockwatch cries and cries about how poor they are and how this suit will possibly bankrupt them because they have nooooo money. I leave it up to you, the reader, to decide if you think Stockwatch is really a penniless, no-asset company or simply a shell for the much larger short hedge funds to continue to publish hatchet jobs with impunity on stocks they could be shorting. You know MY opinion.