News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 2380
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/25/2004

Re: bluediamonds post# 109292

Thursday, 10/21/2004 4:39:39 PM

Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:39:39 PM

Post# of 359156
zen: MORE ON STOCKWATCH/LEE WEBB


Posted by: zeninvestor32
In reply to: None Date:10/21/2004 11:37:29 AM
Post #of 19062

READ THIS

Great find by Nuffy on the CMKX thread. Read this and you will never believe another word from Stockwatch "journalists" again. Note the initial comment from the Supreme Court of British Columbia "the conduct of the defendants in the conduct of this action and in the manner on which it reported on the proceedings was sufficiently reprehensible as to merit an award of special costs." Also, this was great: "the Mudry [stockwatch "reporter"] articles were one-sided, harsh and contained extravagant epithets such as the characterization of Dr. Ager as "a peddler of worthless salted property"". LOL Oh just read it. It's a hoot. And pretty good insight into whether or not you should read one word of Lee Webb.

http://www.lawsonlundell.com/resources/DefamationBriefingNote_June2003.pdf

Also for another hoot, check out this link, wherein poor little Canjex Publishing, owner of Stockwatch cries and cries about how poor they are and how this suit will possibly bankrupt them because they have nooooo money. I leave it up to you, the reader, to decide if you think Stockwatch is really a penniless, no-asset company or simply a shell for the much larger short hedge funds to continue to publish hatchet jobs with impunity on stocks they could be shorting. You know MY opinion.

http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/CA/03/06/2003BCCA0612.htm


Z

As always, these are my personal opinions.

Hopefully nobody in here is investing anything but "fun" money that they can afford to gamble with.


http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4349540

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today