Replies to post #189254 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[Vercingetorix]

"However, if I was NeoMedia and had to hand over some of my toys, I will certainly be asking for some of Scanbuy's toys. This also helps eliminate Scanbuy's lawsuit against NeoMedia which is something the judge will be looking for."

Man, you have a way with obfuscatory words. Reading that you would think that it's Neomedia with its back up against the wall and nowhere to run. Look at the cards on the table - its the reverse.

[hangdog]

The statements are false about what ScanBuy has. Scanbuy has nothing to offer other than having a salesforce that has sold other companies a bill of goods that they cannot deliver on. With the OWNING 30 patent statements in their PRs they have once again proved to be doing exactly what I said above. Some people have a hard time with facts.

[Vercingetorix]

"There are many options for what a settlement looks like. Both parties will get and give.

...However, if I was NeoMedia and had to hand over some of my toys, I will certainly be asking for some of Scanbuy's toys. This also helps eliminate Scanbuy's lawsuit against NeoMedia which is something the judge will be looking for."

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=42436881

So Poptech, I'm interested in what you think of the settlement? Neomedia didn't have to "hand over" any of their toys, but Scanbuy had to "hand over" all their toys (IP) to Neomedia in the form of fully comp'd licensing. It turns out that most shareholders on this board were correct in how they saw the settlement playing out (except for a sizeable treble damages award (though they are forced to pay undisclosed "upfront fees for past infringement")).