News Focus
News Focus
icon url

gatticaa

08/14/09 7:08 PM

#266830 RE: dmiller #266826

someone said, maybe ghors, it comes down to one person's patent terminology against the other. (i'm sure i'm not phrasing that right)
icon url

JimLur

08/14/09 7:45 PM

#266878 RE: dmiller #266826

dmiller, Yes I felt the reverse engineering, opinions by engineers, patent attorneys and legal experts led IDCC to file for an investigation. Evidently the ALJ felt Nokia didn't use our mouse trap.

It's hard to believe not one claim stood up.
icon url

frobinso

08/14/09 8:00 PM

#266889 RE: dmiller #266826

Will there be a Markman hearing as part of the Delaware Trial, or if it is already completed how did they fair? No doubt the non-infringement finding is a setback with respect to getting faster justice and a ban through the ITC. Monday and short-term may not be easy.

However, they both now take these finding back to Delaware, and one point I would like to ask about is that IDCC now brings back validity findings on those patents, and the one short-coming of the ITC hearings are that they do not have a Markman process.

I guess to me now, this all boils down to whether a Markman hearing would conclude that Nokia has infringed the patents also?

I share everyone's dissapointment in the finding of non-infringement.