OT:
Once you start delving into generalities, the argument becomes quite weak.
In the past 50 years, I can name dozens of innovations in electronics and disease treatment. These are all regulated industries.
Can you name 1 innovation by the health insurance industry for every 10 innovations in treatment by drug companies?
>What must be covered is prescribed by state law, so I have to pay for your chiropractic back rubs, herbal "treatments", colonoscopies, and a lot of other stuff I would be glad to do without.<
Well, I have excellent health benefits and I'm quite sure that 2 of the items on your list are not reimbursable under my plan. Hyperbole, like generalities, weakens the argument.
>You people hell-bent on foisting government health care on everyone<
It's clear from the language you're using that you have not followed the discussions on this topic. I would really urge additional reading before letting the ideological outrage fly.