Sorry, I meant O'Quinn. You know the one you said this morning wasn't taking any more cases RE: naked shorting. If you'll do some of that research your so good at, I think you might find he just filed suit again on a completly different case in the last day or 2.
Posted by: janice shell In reply to: Bo14172 who wrote msg# 67972 Date:8/2/2004 1:09:54 AM Post #of 68693
Which one? Two of O'Quinn's suits have been dismissed. The remaining one--the Jag action--has been on hold while everyone awaits a decision from the judge. That judge made O'Quinn amend his complaint twice, and apparently still isn't satisfied that he's made any case at all for a naked short.
Get a subscription to Pacer and read all about it.
Oh yeah: and O'Quinn decided at least a year ago not to accept any more work of this kind.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
