News Focus
News Focus
Followers 3
Posts 808
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/01/2004

Re: janice shell post# 68688

Monday, 08/02/2004 8:44:54 PM

Monday, August 02, 2004 8:44:54 PM

Post# of 359167
Sorry, I meant O'Quinn. You know the one you said this morning wasn't taking any more cases RE: naked shorting.
If you'll do some of that research your so good at, I think you might find he just filed suit again on a completly different case in the last day or 2.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=3705757

Posted by: janice shell
In reply to: Bo14172 who wrote msg# 67972 Date:8/2/2004 1:09:54 AM
Post #of 68693

Which one? Two of O'Quinn's suits have been dismissed. The remaining one--the Jag action--has been on hold while everyone awaits a decision from the judge. That judge made O'Quinn amend his complaint twice, and apparently still isn't satisfied that he's made any case at all for a naked short.

Get a subscription to Pacer and read all about it.

Oh yeah: and O'Quinn decided at least a year ago not to accept any more work of this kind.



Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today