I think that you have worked through the argument quite well.
You also raise a new issue -- is the interest of the auctioneer transparent and straightforward. With so much at stake, who can be sure? (Some horse races seem to be won by who has the best vet. A horse that hasn't won a race in 2 years goes wire-to-wire in stakes company. Amazing!)
Unit holders made a straightforward investment. They played with THEIR OWN MONEY! ... not with shareholder money. It would be a travesty if some "indirect" issue governed the outcome of this dispute. And, if my wife is correct (she's rarely wrong) the law is not about justice.
If that is true, the MOSH team must AVOID surprises ... rather than being adept at handling such issues.
If the expert witnesses and Woodside press release are accepted, there is no "CRAP" here for an auctioneer to bundle. Indeed, as you conclude, there is no need for an auction at this time ... since the value of the properties can not be adequately developed and examined by prospective buyers. LET ALONE THE FACT THAT UNIT HOLDERS HAVE NO DESIRE TO SELL! THE UNIT HOLDERS WANT THE PROPERTIES DEVELOPED AND BROUGHT ON LINE!