Your bloviation was lacking in anything new or useful; I merely translated your dog chasing his own tail (in search of something that is not couched so ridiculously in caveats as to be linguistically and logically meaningless) posting, so don't blame me if it looks deficient upon reflection. Obviously, a rushed fire-sale does not give a true or best-case price, or reflect a full and fair market opportunity with all parties having full information as to all material facts and operating at arms length. Even you understand that (whether you admit it or not). Thus, to use your parlance: - the posited scenario or strategy may or may not produce the optimized outcome, as subjectively seen by individuals who may or may not have an agenda in their perception, and may or may not seek to utilize inherent or exogenous factors for reasons that may or may not be apparent to other individuals who may or may not have their own perceptions and agenda, all of which remains to be seen dependendent upon the assessment of future events that may or may not occur, or be seen as having occurred, all of which may or may not impact the thinking of key decision-makers who seek (by game theory) to optimize their own outcome. So we now agree?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
