News Focus
News Focus
icon url

janice shell

01/21/09 8:44 PM

#266039 RE: dustybutler1 #266037

if one is writing a letter and have ONE opportunity to make your point, you present all the pertinent data.

No, actually you don't. In your first letter you state the essentials. It shouldn't be longer than a page and a half at most. You tell the recipient that you'll be happy to send more material if he or she is interested.

NO WAY is somebody on Obama's staff gonna read the whole thing. Hell, even I didn't.
icon url

TSXminer

01/21/09 9:42 PM

#266042 RE: dustybutler1 #266037

"How could anyone write about CMKX in 2-3 sentences?"

I'll give it a try:

- A slack-jawed carnie from Saskatchewan says he has claims to the world's largest diamond find.

- He sells 700 billion shares to dumb Americans.

- He spends all the money on drinking, gambling, and general whoring around.

icon url

uber darthium

01/21/09 11:45 PM

#266046 RE: dustybutler1 #266037

Yes I could. You probably cannot understand that the person reading Faulk's stupid prose will give it about 5-10 seconds of their attention and them pass it on for a generic response.

I would have implied union, minority, teacher retirement accounts that were decimated by Casavant, friends, and yes, Frizzell.

That just may have caught their attention for another 3-4 seconds.

Faulk's dribble was just that. Dribble

Faulk is no better than Edward Everett.