News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TSXminer

07/02/04 6:34 PM

#44382 RE: average investor #44377

so I definately [sic] have an unfair advantage were [sic] LOGIC is used

Apparently not where proper spelling and grammer is used. Are you sure that 165 wasn't 16.5?
icon url

Jim Bishop

07/02/04 6:37 PM

#44385 RE: average investor #44377

Well then you should be smart enough to see the fatal error in your "simple words" post. It would be correct if you were talking naked short, but we weren't.

There's 100 shares out. I borrow 10 and sell them. There's still 100 shares out. I buy 10 back and deliver them to the lender. There's still only 100 shares out.

Now if I naked shorted, no borrow, I'm selling shares that don't exist and then you have your dilution.






icon url

olico ™

07/02/04 6:45 PM

#44389 RE: average investor #44377

165!!??

With all the misspelled words, and poor grammar......LFAO!
icon url

janice shell

07/02/04 8:05 PM

#44442 RE: average investor #44377

I have been independently tested 5 times in my life, 3 in my first 14 years and the last 10 years ago. My lowest score was 165 at age 14 (puperty and girls kind of skewed the results).

And I am Marie of Rumania.

btw, what is "puperty"?