News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ColeThornton

11/14/08 1:57 AM

#108946 RE: imawswami #108944

imawswami..do "you" read what you write?

About Tim Huff's $10K share purchase, you posted...
"The purchase then represents a lifting of a banner or launch of a flaming arrow (movie GLADIATOR) and a move to battle."
Then we found out he dumped millions in his shares for collateral scheme.

You told us...
"at least it is my belief -that as far back as July, Tim maintained a high degree of certainty this military strat would play into our 4th quarter profit picture."
You posted about a military Strat way back in 2005! They still don't have one.

You told us...
"From what has been found, it seems to swami that future design work on new stratellite devices might incorporate conceptual elements of the Airworm/Airchain developed by Stuttgart U. & Doc Kroplin's team."
imawswami, they're now calling the Airworm the Stratellite. Don't you get it, the Sanswire Stratellite was another complete failure.

You said...
"Nice to see that so far Gov't has yet to award that 180 million Airship contract to Lockheed (award date 10-15-05)... Let's see if the Sanswire testing at Edward's and Fate throw this contract into our laps....."
Not only was there no contract, there never was even any testing at Edward's!

You said...
" It should be obvious to the reader, based on the individual speakers presenting and the particulars of topics covered, that the Stratellite and it's various "versions" have arrived."
You said that over two years ago.... Where are all the "versions" of the Stratellite?

You said...
"Make no mistake, Tim H. knows that to enter the fray, he must possess the "goods" to claim and hold ground."
Do you realize how wrong you were now. Huff had nothing but failure. HotZone failed, MagicMoney failed, Centerline was a fraud, every Strat Huff was involved with failed!

Once again...
"Personally believe GTE has the goods (walking-talking Strat system) down pat or else why walk into the "lions den" of established Satellite industry with talk of "what ifs" or "can you imagine?".
They had nothing but failure, you were completely wrong...

Again!

etc... etc... etc...

icon url

ColeThornton

11/14/08 12:05 PM

#108955 RE: imawswami #108944

"At that TIME(2005) most tech pundits believed the tech for HAPS would arrive anywhere from 2010 to 2015."

Not you imawswami, you told us Huff already had many, years ago! Fortunately, I didn't believe you then either.

"What is the present value of uncertain future 'promising' technology..."
Why do you ask this now, when years ago you said...
"It should be obvious to the reader, based on the individual speakers presenting and the particulars of topics covered, that the Stratellite and it's various "versions" have arrived."

imawswami, you concluded "versions" of Stratellites already existed, based merely on who was speaking at certain events... and now years later you speak of "uncertain future 'promising' technology"

Well that's been my point all along. TAO still has nothing of value, it's still only a "promise" for the future. Because "if" TAO had something they could prove, something important, they would have partnered with a proven, important company that could have offered them all the resources they need. They would not have given away half their company to a miserable, failed disaster like GlobeTel/Sanswire. If you think big companies are not interested in the next big technology, you are just as wrong about them as you have been about GlobeTel. They're just as anxious to get in early as anyone else. Once again, you're simply wrong.

Of course that has not stopped many from telling us about impeccable credentials. About a small player moving in for a song. From claiming they already did the LOE, that the tests were a success, that they actually already went to 65,000 feet, that there are secret investors etc... etc... etc...

You know, the same type stuff we've been hearing from you and others for years now...

I know, I know, it's just the Kool-aid talking...