Replies to post #215158 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[frobinso]

Mschere, not sure whether I heard that from Teecee or the follow-up comments from the other fella who stayed around to hear the ruling, or from reading the transcript that was copied that many of us poured over during that following weekend. I read every post that day and most of the transcript so while I am creative, I don't think I am embellishing the story.

I am pretty sure a joke was made of it, according to one of these three sources.

If judge Batt's was not joking, then she was dead serious and in either case I don't see where her disposition will have any bearing on the outcome of the appeal.

If someone sees how it could mislead anyone it is no skin off my back for someone to delete it.

Say, I don't make fun of you for connecting dots when there is no logical connection between them do I?

I do not have a membership and have no idea if I could delete a post. Do whatever makes you happy.

[JimLur]

I believe her comment was something like I'm sure your going to take this upstairs for appeal.

IMO this Judge had zero knowledge of the technology as well as the law. She could have simply read the ALJ's decision and agreed with that to get it out of her court but no, she instead imposed the injunction knowing her decision would be appealed and decided by another.

Her first 15 minute recess lasted 45 minutes and when I learned that I was hoping she may have read the ALJ's decision on the same issue.

Being clueless of the technology and not being able to decide as a matter of law all she did was drop the ball and try and pass it on to someone else who would be able to make the proper decision.

I can't believe how unlucky we have been with the Judges we have drawn over the years.