Sand: you and I have had a lengthy discussion on the need to promote accepted, independent, industry tests, vs standards and comparable costs with competitive products, in order to market the products and demonstrate instant credibility. I think we are both in close agreement on the import of these data.
Either they read an email you sent asking for that info, or it is one hell of coincidence, since we just barely had the discussion. lol
It will be interesting to see industry testing vs standards along with any comparable cost data they currently have if it is provided.
Just a footnote:
I am quite familiar with the terms "flame resistant", "flame retardant" and "fire proof" along with the differences(none of which were in the article), however I thought "flame suppressant technology "(which was in the PR) a very interesting terminology. I view to "suppress flame" seems like an action word versus a the descriptive adjectives I am used to seeing. Just a note of interest nothing more.
It will be interesting to see which ASTM test is used, assuming that is their standard.