News Focus
News Focus
Followers 323
Posts 19225
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/08/2002

Re: boogaloo post# 2874

Wednesday, 02/20/2008 11:48:48 AM

Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:48:48 AM

Post# of 46244
Sand: you and I have had a lengthy discussion on the need to promote accepted, independent, industry tests, vs standards and comparable costs with competitive products, in order to market the products and demonstrate instant credibility. I think we are both in close agreement on the import of these data.

Either they read an email you sent asking for that info, or it is one hell of coincidence, since we just barely had the discussion. lol

It will be interesting to see industry testing vs standards along with any comparable cost data they currently have if it is provided.

Just a footnote:
I am quite familiar with the terms "flame resistant", "flame retardant" and "fire proof" along with the differences(none of which were in the article), however I thought "flame suppressant technology "(which was in the PR) a very interesting terminology. I view to "suppress flame" seems like an action word versus a the descriptive adjectives I am used to seeing. Just a note of interest nothing more.

It will be interesting to see which ASTM test is used, assuming that is their standard.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y