News Focus
News Focus
icon url

clarity789

02/13/08 5:28 PM

#100852 RE: 2late #100849

Let me try and correct your false assertion that Megas wanted "A FORCED BUY IN to remove a HUGE short position."

Let me show you exactly what Megas said - when he said it - and in his own words... okay?

Here's the link to prove you are wrong - you might not like it, but it is FACTUAL

http://www.primenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=83109

In that PR, Megas talked exclusively about the Carter shares signed by Richard Carter - and the "hundreds of millions of shares" that Carter released into the market

The counterfeits - signed by Thomas Megas - were NOT mentioned. Neither was a SHORT mentioned. Instead, Megas claimed they (the Carter shares) "failed to deliver" what they represented as valid shares of BCIT.

You keep twisting that to mean they were short - they were NOT short, and that is NOT why Megas requested a buy-in.

Megas has never claimed there was a "HUGH short position" as you claimed, and I don't think he would be happy that you are defending him with such nonsense.

Now please - read the PR and accept it for what it says. Especially the last paragraph.



icon url

kruy

02/14/08 12:18 AM

#100900 RE: 2late #100849

Nice rant, but what's all that got to do with you assertion that Megas was "baiting" Art and crew with his early emails and what that would imply?

icon url

zambia123

02/14/08 12:48 AM

#100901 RE: 2late #100849

Best post of the year