News Focus
News Focus
Followers 213
Posts 8379
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/18/2006

Re: 2late post# 100849

Wednesday, 02/13/2008 5:28:07 PM

Wednesday, February 13, 2008 5:28:07 PM

Post# of 159799
Let me try and correct your false assertion that Megas wanted "A FORCED BUY IN to remove a HUGE short position."

Let me show you exactly what Megas said - when he said it - and in his own words... okay?

Here's the link to prove you are wrong - you might not like it, but it is FACTUAL

http://www.primenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=83109

In that PR, Megas talked exclusively about the Carter shares signed by Richard Carter - and the "hundreds of millions of shares" that Carter released into the market

The counterfeits - signed by Thomas Megas - were NOT mentioned. Neither was a SHORT mentioned. Instead, Megas claimed they (the Carter shares) "failed to deliver" what they represented as valid shares of BCIT.

You keep twisting that to mean they were short - they were NOT short, and that is NOT why Megas requested a buy-in.

Megas has never claimed there was a "HUGH short position" as you claimed, and I don't think he would be happy that you are defending him with such nonsense.

Now please - read the PR and accept it for what it says. Especially the last paragraph.




Those who believe without reason... cannot be convinced by reason

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today