News Focus
News Focus
icon url

junkmasterg

01/04/08 8:05 PM

#3434 RE: igotthemojo #3432

i have my doubts

Well then by all means explain how sat rad does NOT directly compete with terrestrial radio, and further, please explain why the NAB is vehemently opposed to a merger. What exactly is their interest? altruistic?

i dont believe they have to wait for for the doj

They don't have to wait, they can release their decision any day. It's my opinion and belief that they will follow the DOJ and that seems to be the majority opinion as well.

probably many people here who also believe mel has mishandled the process

speculation. And if so, I'd figure it to be uninformed finger pointing lacking any real substantive opinion. (not you, you've supplied your reasons)

but i dont think he needs to approve the merger to "further his agenda"

It's not that he "needs" it. Cable television as it exists today is a dying form of media and on demand content and selective tiers are inevitable. Since he has taken on ala carte as a mission (and he certainly has) it makes it very easy for him to support the Sirius/XM merger. He's already said that SIRI/XM has "interesting proposals to justify the merger and protect consumers."

My take continues to be that all he is waiting for is for the DOJ to sign off


icon url

junkmasterg

01/08/08 4:27 PM

#3476 RE: igotthemojo #3432

You'll recall I told you that Kevin Martin will likely approve the merger based on Mel's ala carte plans (which as mentioned, will further his own agenda)

Statements from him today at CES appear to fortify that viewpoint:

XM-Sirius (NasdaqGS: SIRI - News) and Echostar-DirecTV: Shapiro attempted to draw Martin on whether approval of the XM-Sirius merger would bode well for a merger between Echostar (NasdaqGS: DISH - News) and DirecTV (NasdaqGS: DTV - News). Martin wouldn't talk about the pending approval of the satellite radio merger, but spoke about how XM (NasdaqGS: XMSR - News) and Sirius said they'd offer different subscription and content plans to consumers, allowing them more choice over the content they receive at a variety of price points. The implication was that this was an important declaration by the radio companies in terms of their chances of regulatory approval, and Martin said that it would be important for satellite TV companies to offer consumers more control and choice as part of any future merger plans


http://biz.yahoo.com/paidcontent/080108/1_318451_id.html?.v=1