Your post has revealed that you are incapable of making any logical deduction.
First of all, you didn't give details of what the court order holds. You never gave any details of the complicated situation behind this lawsuit. Also, you have never considered the sitation that the injunction can still hold while EFFC can market CRAM/SDS.
The world is not as simple as you thought. I hope you have learned something from our discussion.
What proof do you have that "people are fleeing the stock in droves"?
I see no evidence whatsoever that owners of the stock are actively selling off of their entire positions in droves (i.e. large numbers ) as per your baseless, misleading and untrue statement.
There is good reason to believe that the former shell owner (i.e. ONE INDIVIDUAL) has been selling his position in AH trades over the past weeks, but nothing whatsoever suggests, implies, or proves that a "large number" of shareholders are actively selling off their positions.