News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DewDiligence

11/11/07 1:28 PM

#69605 RE: excel #69604

>I voted no on Payrod not because I don't think the possibility exist but because I have an evil corporate mind… Meaning I think MLB would protect him because he is one of their biggest stars.<

You may have a point there!
icon url

BullNBear52

11/11/07 1:52 PM

#69606 RE: excel #69604

Rest assured Mitchell will never name Ortiz either. This whole thing is a joke. You have a grand jury that leaks like a sieve, Mitchell who is a director of the Red Sox, a Cleveland player being named as using hgh before their last game, and now a leak saying 11 free agents are going to be in the Mitchell report. Mitchell has his own explaining to do and so does Selig.

If you really want this mess cleaned up it needs to go back to Congress. MLB still operates under a limited exemption from the anti-trust laws. Have Congress appoint an independent prosecutor with subpoena power. MLB balks and they lose the exemption.

BTW Seffield has already come clean regarding his steroid use so at this point if Mitchell names him it's yesterday's news.