>>I don't agree with the "duh" in reference to OTCBB boards being the most trouble
I will go out on a limb and say that OTCBB boards have and always will be +/- 90% of the Admin work load. It's just the nature of the sector.
On the topic, I do have a feature request, Bob.
>>I haven't seen a public whine about deletions since you instituted those rules until today.<<
I have a public whine. I'm going to start terminating accounts if I keep running into a few of you that decide you wish to remove after I have restored a post. It's partially my fault, because I have no way of knowing who removed a post initially, then subsequently removed it again after I restored it -- it could have been an Assistant, and I couldn't tell, so I won't point fingers. But I have seen it where some Moderators insist on overturning my restorations. Not cool and I am going to open a massive can of Admin backhand on the next folks who do it, "....if you are the only Moderator on the board....wooo woooo..." "....GOOOOOOO <otcbb stock here>...."
So Bob, to prevent anybody from incurring any physical bodily damage, we need to a way to "lock" a message once it has been restored by me. I'd put this pretty high up on the list for when we get the next round of RB folks in here.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
