News Focus
News Focus
icon url

doogdilinger

09/21/07 12:14 AM

#25429 RE: redrabbit #25423

Yep you could be spot on there red...we'll know soon enough...good post!
icon url

invenstor

09/21/07 12:14 AM

#25431 RE: redrabbit #25423

Very possible.

In other words, maybe this Bruno character has filed a patent for a superior product with MCCY that goes around an existing patent he helped create with Bio. I have seen it happen before.
icon url

Argyll

09/21/07 12:32 AM

#25450 RE: redrabbit #25423

The injunctions are not based on a patent. It is based on proprietary and confidential information which may include trade secrets, trademarks, patents, and anything for which a non-disclosure agreement might have been signed.

icon url

davidam

09/21/07 4:53 PM

#25753 RE: redrabbit #25423

IMO this Biocognisafe will be a non issue. The inventors are with Media and the tech will live on with media. I have no doubts that will be an non issue. From what I understand all the signed contracts ( which will be proven) dont even consist of this tech yet. Its going to be exciting to see what the inventors are ready to unleash .
To think a court in Quebec is going to stop the inventors which one has a patent in the USA to launch their own tech worldwide is funny. This injunction is BS and will be shown to be BS Monday

I understand the BOD of Media who one worked with Biocognisafe is not happy with them. All support is Media. Obviously the inventors jumped ship. You dont think they know whats best for them?