News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Doma

01/31/04 6:13 AM

#27831 RE: keV #27829

Kev...you have just been proved wrong!

Live with it............:))

Doma.
icon url

24601

01/31/04 8:25 AM

#27833 RE: keV #27829

keV: Do these extracts from Intel documentation help?

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2231377

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2231695

In addition, the Intel documentation makes very clear that forgetting a TPM password is an unrecoverable event. What else would a user who's interested in having a trusted platform expect? A back door?

Best wishes,
John







icon url

rachelelise

01/31/04 9:11 AM

#27835 RE: keV #27829

Kev

In reading the last series of posts, I can see that you simply think that management from Wave is lying about what they have built and are testing with undislcosed enterpise clients using either IBM or HP computers.

We've all been told the same things. Key recover and other services are critical to the functioning of a trusted computing environment. That comes from all sources including Intel. We're told that Wave has built services that address this need and they were demoed at conferences last year. We have been told through contacts to the company and I also a remark in one of the conference calls, that we are testing the services with enterprise customers and working to improve them based on real live experience. If you contact the company and ask for further info (a problem if you think they are just going to lie or mislead) you'd learn that things are going well and that they've received a lot of positive feedback and encouragement from customers. But no specifics.

That leads up to today. Where the heck are the services and when will they become available? We don't make money while they sit in the lab or in uncompensated pilots. Valid concern and one of mine. These were expected sooner than today - at least I inferred that.

IDF is coming in a couple of weeks and these services seem like one of the key ingredients to allow wide enterprise adoption. so I assume the availability and details about the services will become much more evident before and/or during the meeting. I will join you in crying if after the meeting we look back and wonder why these services were not mentioned and no one has any idea when they might be avialable or that they were even working. I highly doubt that will happen but few things are guaranteed.

Chill out for a couple of weeks.

P.S. Equating what Wave has done with a dormant back office function for a service that isn't active with what the y are doing with TCG doesn't make much sense. Sure Wave could have spent the time and money to notify everyone that they weren't handling some functions anymore, but for all I know you are almost the only one to ask about their old password. I don't rememebr mine - I don't even remember whay I had one and what is was for.
icon url

TonyMcFadden

01/31/04 9:49 AM

#27839 RE: keV #27829

Dude, the onus is on you. You claim that Wave can't do something, but you can't substantiate it, nor provide any evidence that would even remotely suggest that you are correct.

substantiate
substantiate
substantiate

I could just as easily say that Microsoft is run by a bunch of Illuminati, bent on taking over the world one PC at a time, and ask you to prove me wrong...