Replies to post #150905 on Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[TinyPineTree]

It is what it is.....which is what it has taken to get us here to where we are today. New investors won't care one ioda when the revs start to ramp up the hockey stick.

[Snackman]

I think we all know and agree what the past facts are. What does that matter? The past is the past. We are here because we believe the future will have much better facts going forward.

What is the objective of posting the past facts? Is it to keep others from investing in Wave? Is it a warning to us to sell the stock now, if we own it, because the past says this is a bad investment? What is the objective of telling someone that just bought the stock that the past facts says this is a bad investment. Are you telling that person that he is a fool for buying the stock at $1.62 because of the past?

At least that is the way I read that post.

If I did not believe that the future holds great things for my investment in Wave, I would take my money and find another investment.

[UncleverName]

24601, [edited]

I don't know what Bluefang has been writing, so I'm responding to your point. Wave's "inception" [that's how the early reports read] was February 1988. They were incorporated August 12, 1988, 19 years ago. As such, I think it's fair to say that Indata/Cryptologics had shareholders, but it's true that the company wasn't publicly traded. In fact, I show Indata as having 1,560,000 Class B shares (post-split) at the beginning of time.

Unc

10K:
Wave was incorporated in Delaware under the name Indata Corp. on August 12, 1988. We changed our name to Cryptologics International, Inc. on December 4, 1989. We changed our name again to Wave Systems Corp. on January 22, 1993.