Replies to post #150908 on Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[player1234]

The past is the past.

Yes it is. However, another poster pointed out a couple of weeks ago that the previous posts on the board are pretty damning regarding the ability of people on the board to predict the future of this investment.

How long have people said "the past is the past" or the "future is great" or "this time is different"? It has been said many, many times over the years and the past facts have proven those statements incorrect.

Unclever has pointed out facts that no one can dispute. I see objections to those facts as fears that the past will continue into the future.

Investments are made based on past history and hopes, or fears, of the future. Any attempt to diminish either shows a lack of objectivity.

[UncleverName]

I think we all know and agree what the past facts are. What does that matter? The past is the past. We are here because we believe the future will have much better facts going forward.

What is the objective of posting the past facts?

Snackman, if I new future facts, I'd be happy to post them.

Once again, if you had read the context of my post you wouldn't have to create conflict. I was responding to a poster who said they bought the IPO and it had been a long haul. I was not posting to a buyer at $1.62 as you suggest.

I merely pointed out a couple things relative to the IPO, as I don't think most knew the IPO price or relative float. It has been a longer haul for some than others. And I do hope this company fulfills its promise to him.

[24601]

What would be an example of a fact that is not a "past fact"?