While I do appreciate your hypothesis on the size of the SAM location, not only did I use quantitative data to make my conclusion of the size, I also utilized a qualitative methodology approach with several independent, dependent and distorter variables. You, of all people, being research "wizard", should adhere to the norm of the scientific community, using a "disinterested" approach. This would allow you to remain neutral, impartial, receptive and open to unexpected observations and new ideas. I adhere to "communalism" and prefer to share my knowledge with all.
Please use "organized skepticism" and open your mind up to the possibilities that I may just be correct in my hypothesis about Sulja and its apparent plan to take advantage of current and potential investors by manipulating the stock price using false and misleading press releases and personal direction of trading in the nominee accounts.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
