Guy - it is refreshing to see a response in which the application of the rules of scientific analysis are embraced. I welcome the opportunity to pursue a discourse on your findings and methodology to demonstrate in a rigorous manner a proof of your suppositions concerning SLJB.
As you state that you have used quantitative data as a substrate for your analysis, I am sure you would have no problem replicating it here at this time. Any truly quantitative data must be immediately amenable of exposition and 3rd party review to satisfy the definition of the term.
Additionally, you state that you have applied a qualitative approach using, among other modifiers, dependant and distorter variables. While qualitative analysis is not, in most cases, susceptible of rigorous debate, the statement that you have applied a specific set of modifiers indicates that you can provide not only those modifiers, but a complete description of the methodology you used to apply them as well.
I am indeed fully versed and practiced in the discipline of scientific analysis and review. I welcome the opportunity to apply those methodolgies to your findings about Sulja and SLJB, as you have graciously invited me to do.
I eagerly await your posting of the materials you have claimed to use in an analytical setting to arrive at your current belief s about SLJB.
If after application of those materials, I find myself in agreement with you, I would certainly be the first one to say so.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
