It's not even "their" words it's the ruskies and attorney's allegation, I don't think the investors in that lawsuit have a clue. I don't know if he said it or not nor why if he did. I don't see how you can prove that he did offer them shares. Huff's change of position may have been a "trust" issue but it was too late for that at that time, he'd already pumped it bigtime to the investors. It's all a moot point now, Huff is disconnected from the company (supposedly) and the lawsuit is being settled (supposedly but most likely).
Do I believe that Huff offered them shares ??? YES !!!!
Why ???? because of globetels past and mgmt's chronic habit of using shares like wallet cash.