Replies to post #3750 on Cytogenix (fka CYGX)

[grrdvm1]

cygxup......you have asked some decent questions which board members and I have attempted to answer.
If you feel as nervous as you seem to be about these aspects then I personally would go on to better things which are more comfortable.
I don't think you will find another board / site such as this one where you will get honest, open and highly detailed answers to your questions but the more we answer the more doubt appears.
I enjoy the questions - thats why I take my time (same for neo43 - Thalio - and many more very great minds here) to answer them. I do this for you and the benefit of other posters and even myself. I need, as you do, the long and short of it.
But to call a company which hasn't even started yet a "shell" is not logical at this time (just too soon to make that call realistically).
We have put our faith and money into CYGX and must follow their business plan which looks rather clever to me.
Oh I have some points about past events such as price of secondary offerings, PR's /NA's on one occassion but basically it looks very promising to me.
Perhaps you should print out all impt information (start with Thalio's posts) and complied the facts and make the telephone calls. If you feel there is a shell or scam here then I would get out fast. That would be the smart thing to do and while you sound a little nervous you are smart.
We will try to answer the questions (there have been over a dozen posts to you about questions) but we are not going to listen to questions of slander to a start-up company such as Phannuel Pursuits nor CYGX unless you have definite facts which canbe provided to prove your points.
Best of luck to you - I hope you make a good decision you will be happy with in the future.
Rick

[cygxup]

Thalio, I have great respect for you here on this board. I love what CYGX does and with all my heart, I want it to success. Its success is my success.

I have read all the press releases on CYGX from since 1999 to now. I have gone through the entire CYGX website. I have learned as much as I can on the science of CYGX and its officers.

Yes. CYGX's science is revolutionary and could be a pivotal change in the way diseases are treated. The publications from prestigious university experiments and biotechnology journals are solid.

Yes. CYGX have an impressive Board of Directors and Scientific Advisory Board. They all have great history and accomplishments.

However, sciences plus geniuses does not always equal to commercialization success. (That's why the stock is so cheap, right?) The anouncement of an actual commerical licensing of the herpes cream product to a real life company for a significant amount of money is a tremendous booster of confidence (if it is indeed legitimate). There are many gray areas of business that do not necessarily break the law. Ask Ken Lay of Enron. He is enjoying the good life and the law can't touch him.

If the PUBICLY anounced relationship between CYGX and Phanuel is solid, there need not be any secretiveness regarding the Phanuel organization or the compensation (amount of money) that exchanged hands.

- When is the organization formed?
- What is its corporate address? (US Virgin Islands and ...)?
- Who are the officers?
- What are the organization's products/services/Objectives?
- Who and how can potential customers contact to acquire such products/services?

These are no trade secret, IMO.

A business, be it public or private, will be more than willing to share the above information with the public at large. Billions of dollars are spent by businesses to get corporate name recognition and product/service brand recognition. There are many secrets a company much keep from their competitors, just not the above information.