News Focus
News Focus
icon url

biosectinvestor

03/18/26 6:02 AM

#818327 RE: Baxers #818326

Very interesting. Thank you Baxers.
icon url

Freddydunningkrueger

03/18/26 8:41 AM

#818334 RE: Baxers #818326

If that's true isn't that gamestop level short squeeze territory? I've never really bought the whole massive naked short position story. Let us know if you find out how they derived that number. Thanks for finding that.
icon url

flipper44

03/18/26 9:23 AM

#818340 RE: Baxers #818326

I know you got a lot of likes, but it resembles a computational widget in a beginner’s programming class.
icon url

attilathehunt

03/18/26 9:26 AM

#818342 RE: Baxers #818326

That is why LP should declare a 10% stock dividend and obtain a new cusip and force them to cover.
icon url

Investor082

03/18/26 10:35 AM

#818358 RE: Baxers #818326

Continue to gaslight. There were no naked shorts when the stock touched $2.5 soon after data lock and stayed between $1 and $2 for almost 18 months then. Instead, LP dumped 800M+ shares on bag holders after data lock. Another 700M waiting to be dumped in pennies this year and next. Enjoy averaging down!

LP’s financiers love the naked shorts narrative so they can continue to dump these shares. LOL! ;)