News Focus
News Focus
icon url

learningcurve2020

11/21/25 12:23 PM

#799140 RE: martyDg #799131

Can’t even get a majority to insist on an independent CFO, the most basic of things for concerned investors. 🤷‍♀️🤷🏻‍♂️

>>And of course someone will say that voting NO is “sabotaging my own investment.”
icon url

montelo3go

11/21/25 12:41 PM

#799146 RE: martyDg #799131

Couldn’t agree with you more. My millions of shares are going NO. Enough with the carrots!!
icon url

Investor082

11/21/25 1:30 PM

#799172 RE: martyDg #799131

At the very least, their compensation should be tied to consistent shareholder returns. Shareholders would be stupid not to do that!

These folks have a history of screwing shareholders and then blaming it on manipulation and coming up with excuses. Nothing will change. It’s been 15+ years of the same BS! The share price (split adjusted) has gone down from $200+ to .20s. And it won’t stop there. Expect the share price to be under .10 before the end of 2026 regardless of the UK decision as half a billion more shares get added next year.
icon url

QL300

11/21/25 1:43 PM

#799177 RE: martyDg #799131

They don't need to scrape together any votes. The proposal are going to pass by an overwhelming majority. Your few hundred thousand votes makes no difference. If you're not happy, sell the stock. You're still holding for a reason. 
icon url

RobotDroid

11/21/25 2:05 PM

#799187 RE: martyDg #799131

Well said, The fact that they are asking for more undeserved $$ for doing nothing but destroy SH is the height of selfishness. And of course several idiots here will stupidly vote yes, displaying their years worth of ignorance. Trust me, the increase will come WITHOUT AN APPROVAL. This is one of the Greatest Grifts of the decade.