I’ve seen several credible posters like Senti allude to the fact that the consultants really botched the original MAA and LP/LG had to fix it. IDK anything just like even else but I like to consider all the possibilities. I LOVE YOUR EXPLANATION AND YOUVE BEEN SAYING IT FOR A LONG TIME... HOWEVER PERHAPS the defects in the MAA were deemed fixable and therefore not material. Not sure if you remember the big argument between Andrea or DD and biosectinvestor about how material events aren't really what the public or AI make them out to be. There's an argument that could be made that only a final MAA rejection is material and everything else is not. I don't like that argument from an investor standpoint but either way I do think we get approved in the next 4-6 weeks.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
