News Focus
News Focus
icon url

tedpeele

11/12/25 7:54 AM

#225659 RE: UCHusky #225620

I want this PR to be about someone other than Nokia, as I showed the consensus timeline to plasmonic adoption is very long.

I’m willing to not post for an entire month if someone would provide the proof. All that needs to be done is to get confirmation from the company that the company in the PR is really currently in the global 500 as it implies.

That should be simple to do. Companies confiirm the accuracy of their PRS all the time.

Walter apparently is unable or unwilling to back up his claim to me that he had proof, for reasons that he won’t provide. Not a good look.

TRUTH

As for your challenge to my logic, I sent you a PM explaining it
icon url

tedpeele

11/12/25 8:09 AM

#225662 RE: UCHusky #225620

Your assessment of my logic is based on the idea that an assumption has no value.

There are good assumptions, and there are bad assumptions. When I said it was a strong argument from silence that was based on the idea that my assumption had a high likelihood of being accurate.

But Scope has to warn everybody of my “agenda”. Yeah my agenda of wanting to make sure this is as good as what most here think it is. 🙄

Contrary to this boards consensus opinion, I’m not trying to sew doubt.

I AM TRYING TO REMOVE DOUBT that years of disappointment have caused. I simply want the PR to mean what it sounds like so that I can know this is a deal with a huge company that isnt Nokia

But up is down here and down is up. The innocent are guilty and the guilty are innocent.

Proto is the hero even though he’s been wrong hundreds of times in calling for a deal any day and millions of revenue six years ago.

And I’m the devil incarnate even though I’ve been right time and again since arriving three years ago.

TRUTH


..

.