Let's discuss this comment of yours.
"I assume by now he has been asked, and he has not answered. That actually serves as pretty strong evidence that it must be Nokia, although its possible that he has not realized he can answer the question. Although this is an argument from silence, it is a strong one."
You star with "I assume" and finish with it being a strong argument. That's why you're a fraud. You us AI, which is a glorified Google search, as factual evidence. That's why you're a fraud. You admitted you don't know the science, but then pretend to understand the hurdles they face. That's why you're a fraud. You've got the nerve to challenge those that do get it, like Fruno. That's why you're a fraud. You pretend to take this abuse from the board for the purely humanitarian reason of helping the newbies. That's why you're a fraud.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
