Replies to post #225610 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[walterc]

thank you

i think you can understand my frustration of having the cards but not being allowed to play them.

[tedpeele]

Wow--you aren't very logical. My Dad, who is in his 90s is a world renowned mathematician in his specialty.

I am in the top 1% of people in mathematical ability. That means I'm probably pretty decent at logic.

IF someone gives me Yves email I'll email him myself.

DONE POSTING FOR THE DAY, so spartex you can begin buying now...or is it GP and me?
Let's get er done!!! 🤪

At any rate, the reason this Nokia issue matters to me is that I am always looking 6-12 months out on this company, and afaik they would only be working on plasmonics (of course X is now pushing something more because he sees the logic in what I'm saying--what a jerker..um I mean joker!!)

So, check this out:

[tedpeele]

You start with "I assume" and finish with it being a strong argument. That's why you're a fraud.

Handled in the previous post.

You use AI, which is a glorified Google search, as factual evidence. That's why you're a fraud.

This is a bizarre claim. AI is getting better all of the time, and I when I use it I do so critically - asking questions to help weed out misleading or even wrong answers. A search engine retrieves existing documents; AI language models generate responses by synthesizing linguistic and conceptual patterns from training data.Therefore, equating AI with a search engine is factually incorrect.

You admitted you don't know the science, but then pretend to understand the hurdles they face. That's why you're a fraud.

You are quite the absolutist. I don't pretend to understand the hurdles. I know that there ARE hurdles and I have some limited understanding of them. Few if any posters here understand the science well enough to project anything with any certainty.

You've got the nerve to challenge those that do get it, like Fruno. That's why you're a fraud.

I assume you are referring to 'getting' the exceedingly complicated science. See my last sentence above. When Fruno or anyone else can address the obvious shortcomings of the company in an unbiased, reasonable manner, then I will give their views on the science more respect. Until then I can only conclude they are biased.

You pretend to take this abuse from the board for the purely humanitarian reason of helping the newbies. That's why you're a fraud.

Where are you getting this nonsense from? I've never made this claim.

My assessment of you is simple: You don't recognize nuance very well. You are an all or nothing thinker. If you weren't you'd understand me far better than you do, and you'd never resort to such extreme characterizations.