News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MrBobbob

11/09/25 8:57 PM

#506375 RE: rosemountbomber #506374

I agree.

Another thing to consider about this statement.

They received an unambiguous request to file after presenting “the majority” of the data. When they filed, they presented “all” of the data which likely strengthened their case even more.
icon url

Hoskuld

11/09/25 9:40 PM

#506378 RE: rosemountbomber #506374

No fuel for a lawsuit: everything he said was after the Safe Harbor Statement was read. He could have been fabricating everything (and I think you have to assume there was some fabrication in there) and it still wouldn't be actionable. The courts have already decided that "puffery" is legal.