News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Investor2014

10/30/25 10:43 AM

#505091 RE: Hoskuld #505089

It is thought that, if we are to believe Missling, would be a good route to look after shareholder value as he always like to say.
icon url

tredenwater2

10/30/25 10:51 AM

#505093 RE: Hoskuld #505089

Is it possible that an MA (of any sort) triggers an agreement that has already been negotiated between Anavex and a BP (Roche, Sanofi, etc.) where they take a significant stake at a high share price valuation or buy out Anavex completely?



I definitely agree with the “take a significant stake at a high share price…” part. Receiving an MAA would justify the high share price to the BOD. Also a seat or two on the BOD would normally be created for the partner(s)

Is this why trials are paused - why PD has not started - because the BP wants to manage those trials?



Your scenario is very plausible but I honestly think Dr. Missling wants to run these trials and “feed” approvals into the partners, at least until prophylactic use is achieved. BP has a way of screwing up trials with slow lethargic decision processes. If I were the lucky BP that won the bidding process I would weigh in at the Board level but let current management continue knowing that one approval, for AD alone of all disease’s, justifies our MOA. The rest of ghe approvals come easier imo even if slightly less hurdles to clear.

🤞
icon url

boi568

10/30/25 11:03 AM

#505097 RE: Hoskuld #505089

I think that, other than an immediate buyout, all of that is quite possible. Missling is going to try to maximize the company's valuation, which should rule out an immediate buyout.
icon url

powerwalker

10/30/25 12:51 PM

#505113 RE: Hoskuld #505089

Merck is a Consortium partner. I like the "... Ready For Larger than $15 billion Deals ..."

Merck Ready For Larger Than $15 Billion Deals, Raises Annual Profit Outlook



https://www.fidelity.com/news/article/investment-news/202510301224BENZINGAFULLNGTH48535333
Bullish
Bullish