A YouTube interview is typically a communication or testimony. It's basically a non binding dialogue of intent. A lot can happen between now and two weeks into January 2026 that may or may not alter the timing. There's a lot of Elbow Room for embellishment, but there's no formal regulatory signature. A video can be evidence of a statement but there's no verifiable record assigning specific signing dates so it can never substitute for the required filing. Basically what you heard is educated bafflegab. Weasel words without legal merit that can easily change very significantly.
You can't hold Oscar legally to anything from this video. He is simply defining a framework of future business expected , otherwise known as a forward-looking statement. Unless it's referenced and Incorporated by a legally recognized process. Hypothetically Oscar can say just about anything he sees fit and not be held accountable in any legal context.
The only thing I picked up on of any credulity was he fully intends to commence a reverse split in the near future. No concrete dates were given , no ratios were even attempted. Man he didn't even mention the word lawyer. Scanty information to say the least and yes I'm still waiting for an annual general meeting where shareholders can express their voice to be heard and not muzzled as we just were. God knows when that'll be either! 🙄🤥🤫
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
