News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ohsaycanyousee82

09/30/25 2:54 PM

#501781 RE: Investor2014 #501780

Didn’t Kun Jin come on board around the time that decision would have been made?

Would he not have recommended that a confirmatory trial been done if he felt one was needed from his FDA experience/expertise?

They did not initiate and he has not left for another gig.
icon url

ExtremelyBullishZig

09/30/25 2:57 PM

#501783 RE: Investor2014 #501780

The continued post hoc analysis is to keep up demand so they can continue to dilute.
icon url

boi568

09/30/25 3:33 PM

#501785 RE: Investor2014 #501780

I am discussing the 2b/3 without the follow ups. What is your issue there that triggers your second trial requirement -- truthfulness of the underlying numbers or distrust of stat sig p values?
icon url

catdaddy

10/01/25 11:52 AM

#501860 RE: Investor2014 #501780

As you stated, "My chance of CMA is 75% - possibly too generous"

So, which is it? 75% or significantly less? Need you on record.