News Focus
News Focus
icon url

JerryCampbell

08/09/25 5:13 PM

#780497 RE: Slave1 #780495

I did not post rules, simply tried to explain what has worked well for other posters.

You have proved repeatedly that you do not proofread in any meaningful way.

1) Fictitious SEC filing quotes that you tried to repeatedly justify before finally admitting the problem.
2) Silly mistakes about dcvax and Direct that others have pointed out.


Quoting inaccuracy - If you know AI cannot be trusted on quotes, wouldn't it be smart to not post AI output that includes unvetted quotes?
icon url

FeMike

08/09/25 5:16 PM

#780498 RE: Slave1 #780495

I think the main problem is that just about everything you post, you imply or outright say it is 100% factual. “Not conjecture”.

And you are wrong about a lot of this stuff. But you only ever correct it after someone calls you out. And that’s only sometimes. I called you out on the factually, patently incorrect timeline you made when you claimed NWBO has “likely” already submitted an application with the FDA. You still haven’t corrected yourself on that blatantly irresponsible lie.

You are objectively wrong and have to correct yourself extremely frequently. You claim you proofread and check these things before you post, but you’re still wrong. So either you don’t actually check AI, or you just really don’t know what you’re talking about.
icon url

Steady_T

08/09/25 11:23 PM

#780521 RE: Slave1 #780495

What you're missing in your explanation is that you are shifting the fact checking and responsibility for accuracy in your posts to the readers.

And that does not inspire confidence.
icon url

Chiugray

08/10/25 3:09 AM

#780528 RE: Slave1 #780495

Andrew, Thanks for using AI as a tool to supplement your real life knowledge and experience and sharing it with us.

For me, I use AI as a tool like a next-gen search engine. It helps me research better and learn faster.

For those reading posts here as part of due diligence, you can run it through AI for feedback. Create a dialogue and learn more fully about the topic.

It has always been and it will always be:
- don't trust anonymous posters on a board
- assess
- a poster's credibility can be earned
- but it depends on you to assess

The complexity arises in investing
- investing is looking into the future
- AI can be used to convincingly deceive
- AI can be a tool to uncover deceit
- the truth will prevail but investing is in probabilities
- therefore the art of due diligence is best in a larger group
- it is called Network Effects,
- where goodwill begets more goodwill
- more dialogue leads to better outcomes

The quantity and quality of all the above depends on:
- due diligence (investing as in life)
- time-invested (in order to see the signal from the noise)
- patience (when unicorn company investing)
Bullish
Bullish