Saturday, August 09, 2025 4:59:43 PM
1. On “making the rules”
for AI use Jerry Campbell” doesn’t set the standards for AI use here. Every member is free to choose their process as long as it follows site rules. AI is a tool, not bound to one method, and no single poster’s personal guidelines govern the rest of us.
2. Proofreading and quality control
The claim I don’t proofread is flat-out wrong. I review my posts and correct errors, often within minutes. That is quality control. The occasional human error is normal, but it’s addressed immediately and transparently.
3. User identity and attribution
I post under my real name. My history is public and searchable. It’s obvious I’m a human using AI as a tool. That alone makes the “identify the post as AI” demand irrelevant.
4. Including prompts
Publishing my prompts is unnecessary. The output shows exactly how I guided it. I’m the driver, AI is the vehicle, and like Boba Fett’s Slave I, there’s only one pilot seat.
5. Quoting accuracy
I’ve said before: AI can’t be trusted with unsourced quotes. If I quote from memory and it’s off, I correct it. That’s already part of my process.
6. Fact vs. analysis
I present analysis based on science and public data, not unverified AI statements as fact. Where it’s opinion, I say so. Where it needs correction, I fix it.
7. Gaslighting and self-appointment
Setting yourself up as the arbiter of “proper” AI use without authority is gaslighting. And honestly, who made you moderator? That’s the biggest joke of all.
8. Disclaimers
I consistently add disclaimers so readers know whether they’re seeing analysis, opinion, or interpretation. That’s transparency, and it’s deliberate.
Closing statement:
I use AI to assemble complete, sourced narratives that no one else here is delivering, narratives that would otherwise be scattered fragments. My work is transparent, corrected when necessary, and backed by my real identity. If someone’s objection is that I don’t follow their personal style guide, that’s not a flaw in my content. It’s a reminder that my posts raise the bar for depth and sourcing, which is exactly why they get read.
for AI use Jerry Campbell” doesn’t set the standards for AI use here. Every member is free to choose their process as long as it follows site rules. AI is a tool, not bound to one method, and no single poster’s personal guidelines govern the rest of us.
2. Proofreading and quality control
The claim I don’t proofread is flat-out wrong. I review my posts and correct errors, often within minutes. That is quality control. The occasional human error is normal, but it’s addressed immediately and transparently.
3. User identity and attribution
I post under my real name. My history is public and searchable. It’s obvious I’m a human using AI as a tool. That alone makes the “identify the post as AI” demand irrelevant.
4. Including prompts
Publishing my prompts is unnecessary. The output shows exactly how I guided it. I’m the driver, AI is the vehicle, and like Boba Fett’s Slave I, there’s only one pilot seat.
5. Quoting accuracy
I’ve said before: AI can’t be trusted with unsourced quotes. If I quote from memory and it’s off, I correct it. That’s already part of my process.
6. Fact vs. analysis
I present analysis based on science and public data, not unverified AI statements as fact. Where it’s opinion, I say so. Where it needs correction, I fix it.
7. Gaslighting and self-appointment
Setting yourself up as the arbiter of “proper” AI use without authority is gaslighting. And honestly, who made you moderator? That’s the biggest joke of all.
8. Disclaimers
I consistently add disclaimers so readers know whether they’re seeing analysis, opinion, or interpretation. That’s transparency, and it’s deliberate.
Closing statement:
I use AI to assemble complete, sourced narratives that no one else here is delivering, narratives that would otherwise be scattered fragments. My work is transparent, corrected when necessary, and backed by my real identity. If someone’s objection is that I don’t follow their personal style guide, that’s not a flaw in my content. It’s a reminder that my posts raise the bar for depth and sourcing, which is exactly why they get read.
Bullish
Recent NWBO News
- How Advanced Drug Delivery Could Improve Existing Cancer Treatments • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 06/01/2026 12:30:00 PM
- CNS Drug Delivery Breakthroughs Unlock Significant Biotech Market Opportunities • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 05/11/2026 01:00:00 PM
- CNS Drug Delivery Breakthroughs Unlock Significant Biotech Market Opportunities • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/11/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Appoints Dr. Annalisa Jenkins As Strategic Adviser To Advance Dendritic Cell Cancer Vaccine Platform • PR Newswire (US) • 04/30/2026 04:38:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Appoints Dr. Annalisa Jenkins As Strategic Adviser To Advance Dendritic Cell Cancer Vaccine Platform • PR Newswire (US) • 04/30/2026 04:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
